Karl Heideck On Philadelphia’s New Salary History Law

Karl Heideck breaks down lawsuits
Karl Heideck breaks down lawsuits

Philadelphia is on the road to becoming the first state to pass a law that will protect employees from the mandatory questions about their previous salaries during interviews. This proposed law has faced a lot of opposition, especially from the Chamber of Commerce for Greater Philadelphia. The chamber almost instantly went to the court to question the constitutionality of this law.

Although the courts suspended the hearing, the chamber has been asked to either amend their motion or drop it because there is no evidence that the law is impacting negatively on any member or associate of the Commerce Chamber.

This ruling by the court has given the proposed law a future; even if it is not yet passed, there is a future for it. If this law is passed, all employers in Philadelphia will be required by law not to ask directly or indirectly what an employee was earning when conducting an interview. The employers will not be allowed to use independently acquired data regarding the salary of employees without the consent of the named employee.

Like Karl Heideck on Facebook.

Although some employers have no problem with the law, some will find a way of not complying. With a lot of information being available on the internet, it is easy to almost correctly predict an employee’s salary, especially if the real estate information is considered. A person’s income can be estimated depending on the place they live or the properties they own. There will be a penalty of $2000 per instance for any employer that will break this law.

Karl Heideck is not just a lawyer who helps his clients and the people of Pennsylvania with risk management and compliance issues. He is also an author of many popular blogs through which he shares his insight with the world.

Karl is a listed Contract Attorney who has been listed by Hire Counsel since 2015. Before working with Hire Counsel, he had gained a lot of experience when working at Conrad O’Brien as an associate and a project attorney at Pepper Hamilton LLP. This is after he got his law degree from Temple University’s James E. Beasley School of Law.

For more information about Karl Heideck, just click this site.

Geoffrey Cone An Attorney At Cone Marshall Offers Insight On New Zealand’s Foreign Trusts

Misleading media coverage about New Zealand’s trusts makes it seem as though New Zealand is a tax haven. Mr. Cone, an experienced corporate tax lawyer, responded to those misleading media reports. He described three characteristics of tax havens. They impose nil or nominal taxes; there is a lack of transparency and refusal to share financial information with other governments.

New Zealand does not meet any of those characteristics, therefore, is unlikely to feature as a tax haven anytime soon. In fact, New Zealand has demonstrated transparency in its handling of foreign trusts to help other governments who would be interested in that information. In 2006, new rules were put in place that requires trustees of foreign funds to provide relevant information about themselves as well as record every movement in the Fund’s account.

With 39 double tax agreements, New Zealand has minimum tax impediments in cross-border trade. These agreements also ensure minimum tax evasion in New Zealand. In addition to the double tax agreements, New Zealand has signed a multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters and partnered with over 20 countries to share tax information to curb tax evasion.

New Zealand has seen steady growth in the number of trusts being administered thanks to its positive global reputation as being a safe place to invest. Good governance, as well as high quality legal and professional infrastructure, have also contributed to the growth of foreign trusts. New Zealand’s service providers consist of qualified lawyers and financial advisors who operate foreign trusts on behalf of international clients. They are responsible for enhancing the country’s reputation among international taxation experts and in the OECD as well.

The rules and regulations imposed on New Zealand don’t allow competition with tax havens. When it comes to Foreign Trusts, New Zealand only competes with countries, which have similar transparent tax systems such as the UK, US, Singapore, etc.

About Cone Marshall

Cone Marshall is a registered law firm in New Zealand that deals with global families and their financial and legal advisors. Its managing partners Geoffrey Cone and Karen Marshall are two experienced advocates with over ten years in the craft. Cone Marshall provides consultancy services on New Zealand’s tax and trusts laws.

Cone Marshall is the only law firm in the entire New Zealand region to specialize exclusively in tax planning and international trusts. It provides trust management, administrative and trustee services via its affiliated companies. It offers its consulting services to family advisors, banks and other institutions based outside New Zealand to help with planning.